Modlin v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 433, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 304

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Modlin v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Cust. Ct. 434 →

United States Customs Court·Decided April 29, 1953·No. No. 57274; protests 615155-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that .the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim, for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in. C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in. C. D. 1480, supra.

Modlin v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 433, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 304 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 433 (Modlin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)

Opinion

Related