Modlin v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Modlin v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 433, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 304

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 29, 1953

DocketNo. 57274; protests 615155-G, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Cust. Ct. 433 (Modlin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Modlin v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 433, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 304 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that .the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim, for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in. C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that .the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim, for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in. C. D. 1480, supra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Cust. Ct. 433, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/modlin-v-united-states-cusc-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack