Modlin v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Modlin v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 434, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 307

United States Customs Court·Decided April 29, 1953·No. No. 57277; protests 929743-G, etc. (New York)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was- sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion inC. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was- sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion inC. D. 1480, supra.

Modlin v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 434, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 307 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 434 (Modlin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related