Home/Supreme Court/Modden v. Texas

Modden v. Texas

485 U.S. 1040, 108 S. Ct. 1603, 99 L. Ed. 2d 917, 56 U.S.L.W. 3752, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1987
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 2, 1988
Docket87-6138
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 485 U.S. 1040 (Modden v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Modden v. Texas, 485 U.S. 1040, 108 S. Ct. 1603, 99 L. Ed. 2d 917, 56 U.S.L.W. 3752, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1987 (1988).

Opinions

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowens v. Atlantic Maintenance Corp.
546 F. Supp. 2d 55 (E.D. New York, 2008)
Hunter TBA, Inc. v. Triple V Sales
250 F.R.D. 116 (E.D. New York, 2008)
Commission v. Local 638 ... Local 28 of Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n
921 F. Supp. 1126 (S.D. New York, 1996)
State v. Klempt
910 P.2d 326 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1995)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638 ... Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n
889 F. Supp. 642 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Ellis v. State
1992 OK CR 45 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1994)
Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants
959 F.2d 1468 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Richmark Corp., a California Corporation v. Timber Falling Consultants, an Oregon Corporation, Timber Falling Consultants, an Oregon Corporation, Counterclaim v. Richmark Corp., a California Corporation, Peacock Mfg. Co., a Texas Corporation, Zhu Yuanchang, Eugene Wang, James Yang, and Francis Tong, Counterclaim and Beijing Ever Bright Industrial Co., a Foreign Corporation, Counterclaim
959 F.2d 1468 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 91-02922
955 F.2d 670 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
Hernandez v. State
819 S.W.2d 806 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Finley v. State
809 S.W.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
New York Times Co. v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union
740 F. Supp. 240 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Sattiewhite v. State
786 S.W.2d 271 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Drywall Tapers & Pointers of Greater New York, Local 1974 of I.B.P.A.T. v. Local 530 of Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons International Ass'n
889 F.2d 389 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Drywall Tapers And Pointers Of Greater New York, Local 1974 Of I.B.P.A.T. v. Local 530 Of Operative Plasterers And Cement Masons International Association
889 F.2d 389 (Second Circuit, 1989)
New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry
886 F.2d 1339 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Pro Choice Coalition v. Terry
886 F.2d 1339 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Shulton, Inc. v. Optel Corp.
126 F.R.D. 80 (S.D. Florida, 1989)
Erlandson v. State
763 S.W.2d 845 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Purtell v. State
761 S.W.2d 360 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 U.S. 1040, 108 S. Ct. 1603, 99 L. Ed. 2d 917, 56 U.S.L.W. 3752, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/modden-v-texas-scotus-1988.