Home/Supreme Court/Mobile Transportation Co. v. City of Mobile

Mobile Transportation Co. v. City of Mobile

199 U.S. 604, 26 S. Ct. 751, 50 L. Ed. 330, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 966
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 11, 1905
DocketNo. 103
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 199 U.S. 604 (Mobile Transportation Co. v. City of Mobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mobile Transportation Co. v. City of Mobile, 199 U.S. 604, 26 S. Ct. 751, 50 L. Ed. 330, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 966 (1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 826, c. 517, §6; Colorado Central Consolidated Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U. S. 47; Carey v. Houston and Texas Central Railway Company, 161 U. S. 115; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Gableman v. Peoria Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335, 339; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526; Mobile Transportation Company v. Mobile, 187 U. S. 482; S. C., 195 U. S. 631.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamb v. General Associates, Inc.
374 P.2d 677 (Washington Supreme Court, 1962)
United States v. Mulligan
177 F. Supp. 384 (D. Oregon, 1959)
Union Carbide Corp. v. Goett
256 F.2d 449 (Fourth Circuit, 1958)
Union Carbide Corporation v. Ellen Goett
256 F.2d 449 (Third Circuit, 1958)
In Re Ballantine's Estate
81 N.W.2d 259 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1957)
Bannerman v. Close
81 N.W.2d 259 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1957)
Polarus Steamship Co., Inc., as Owner of the T/s Polarusoil, Libelant-Appellee v. The T/s Sandefjord, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Viriks Rederi A/s (Haldor Virik, Manager), Viriks Rederi A/s (Haldor Virik, Manager) as Owner of the T/s Sandefjord, Cross-Libelant-Appellant v. The T/s Polarusoil, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Polarus Steamship Co., Inc., Cross-Respondent-Appellee
236 F.2d 270 (Second Circuit, 1956)
Polarus Steamship Co. v. The T/S Sandefjord
236 F.2d 270 (Second Circuit, 1956)
Ferguson v. Patterson
191 F.2d 584 (Tenth Circuit, 1951)
Griffith v. Bank of New York
147 F.2d 899 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Le Mieux Bros. v. Tremont Lumber Co.
52 F. Supp. 116 (W.D. Louisiana, 1943)
Kelley v. Queeney
41 F. Supp. 1015 (W.D. New York, 1941)
Scott v. Beams
122 F.2d 777 (Tenth Circuit, 1941)
Nagle v. Wyoga Gas & Oil Corp.
10 F. Supp. 905 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1935)
Lovell v. Newman & Son
227 U.S. 412 (Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 U.S. 604, 26 S. Ct. 751, 50 L. Ed. 330, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobile-transportation-co-v-city-of-mobile-scotus-1905.