Mobile River Saw Mill Co. v. Commissioner

8 B.T.A. 368, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2891
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedSeptember 29, 1927
DocketDocket No. 8700.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 B.T.A. 368 (Mobile River Saw Mill Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mobile River Saw Mill Co. v. Commissioner, 8 B.T.A. 368, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2891 (bta 1927).

Opinion

[369]*369OPINION.

Littleton:

Petitioner raises no issue with respect to the market price of $22.50 per thousand feet fixed by the respondent in the deficiency notice for the purpose of valuing the inventory at the close of 1920. At the hearing, respondent conceded that the total quantity of inventoriable lumber on hand was 4,790,778 feet, instead of 5,323,087 feet shown in the deficiency notice. Based upon a total quantity of 4,790,778 feet, and a market price of $22.50 per thousand feet, the value of petitioner’s closing inventory for 1920 is $107,792.51, rather than $118,438.69 shown in the deficiency notice.

Respondent’s reduction of invested capital for 1920 by $1,622.03 on account of 1939 income and profits taxes is in accordance with the provisions of section 1207 of the Revenue Act of 1926, and, therefore, correct.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Considered by Smith and Love.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mobile River Saw Mill Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 368 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 B.T.A. 368, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobile-river-saw-mill-co-v-commissioner-bta-1927.