Moad v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.

502 F. Supp. 2d 1356, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61586
CourtUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
DecidedAugust 16, 2007
DocketNo. MDL NO. 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 502 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (Moad v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moad v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 502 F. Supp. 2d 1356, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61586 (jpml 2007).

Opinion

TRANSFER ORDER

HEYBURN, Chairman.

Plaintiffs in the District of South Carolina action have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the District of South Carolina. This litigation currently consists of two actions, one action each in the Northern District of Illinois and the District of South Carolina. Defendants1 support this motion, as do plaintiffs in the Northern District of Illinois action.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that these [1357]*1357actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the District of South Carolina will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. These actions share factual questions relating to allegations that defendants entered into an agreement concerning the method for calculating fuel surcharges in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Centralization under Section 1407 will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, especially with respect to class certification; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.

We are persuaded that the District of South Carolina is an appropriate transferee forum for this litigation, because the first-filed and more advanced action is pending there, and all responding parties favor centralization in the District of South Carolina.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the action pending in the Northern District of Illinois is transferred to the District of South Carolina and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable C. Weston Houck for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the action pending there.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Household Goods Movers Antitrust Litig.
502 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 F. Supp. 2d 1356, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moad-v-atlas-van-lines-inc-jpml-2007.