M.O. v. State
227 So. 3d 193, 2017 WL 2304661
Opinion
We affirm the circuit court’s adjudication of delinquency and sentence in all respects except the restitution order, which, on the State’s confession of error, [194]*194we reverse and remand for the court to-render proper findings. See M.W.G. v. State, 945 So.2d.597, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“When no evidence of what the child could reasonably be expected to earn is presented at the restitution hearing, the trial court cannot make a finding on this issue.”)
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M.O. v. State, 227 So. 3d 193, 2017 WL 2304661 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
227 So. 3d 193 (M.O. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.