M.O. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 2017·No. 2D16-1903·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

M.O., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-1903 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed May 26, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert A. Bauman, Judge.

Jason D. Sammis and Leslie M. Sammis, Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cornelius C. Demps, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court's adjudication of delinquency and sentence in all

respects except the restitution order, which, on the State's confession of error, we

reverse and remand for the court to render proper findings. See M.W.G. v. State, 945 So. 2d 597, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("When no evidence of what the child could

reasonably be expected to earn is presented at the restitution hearing, the trial court

cannot make a finding on this issue.")

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.O. v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

M.O. v. State (M.O. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M.W.G. v. State
945 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)