M.O. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

M.O. v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 26, 2017

Docket2D16-1903

StatusPublished

This text of M.O. v. State (M.O. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M.O. v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

M.O., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-1903 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed May 26, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert A. Bauman, Judge.

Jason D. Sammis and Leslie M. Sammis, Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cornelius C. Demps, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court's adjudication of delinquency and sentence in all

respects except the restitution order, which, on the State's confession of error, we

reverse and remand for the court to render proper findings. See M.W.G. v. State, 945 So. 2d 597, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("When no evidence of what the child could

reasonably be expected to earn is presented at the restitution hearing, the trial court

cannot make a finding on this issue.")

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI