Mo. River, Fort Scott & Gulf Rld. v. Blake

9 Kan. 489
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 Kan. 489 (Mo. River, Fort Scott & Gulf Rld. v. Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mo. River, Fort Scott & Gulf Rld. v. Blake, 9 Kan. 489 (kan 1872).

Opinion

'The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kingman, C. J.:

This case is like the case of the same plaintiff against Morris, as Treasurer, and Wheaton as Sheriff, of Bourbon county, 7 Kas., 210. The 'decision in that case will control the decision of this. The reasoning in that case does not appear satisfactory to the counsel for the plaintiff in -error. It is possible that a restatement of the grounds of the opinion, after having the benefit of the criticism of counsel, might obviate some of their objections thereto; but the con•clusion would remain unchanged. We are content to let t-hc -decision of this case rest upon the reasons given in that -opinion, without change. The original petition in this case was precisely like that of the Bourbon county case. The /amended petition has some new averments; but the learned [496]*496counsel certainly does not think they are of a character to change the decision, or to challenge a grave review. The judgment will be affirmed.'

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comm'rs of Johnson Co. v. Ogg
13 Kan. 198 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1874)
Hudson v. Commiss'rs of Atchison County
12 Kan. 140 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Kan. 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mo-river-fort-scott-gulf-rld-v-blake-kan-1872.