M.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services

987 So. 2d 1267, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422, 2008 WL 3540242
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in M.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 2008·No. No. 1D07-6527·Published

Opinion

BENTON, J.

“[T]he availability of a nonadoptive placement with a relative may not ... be considered as a factor weighing against termination of parental rights.” § 39.810(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). Since the child’s mother’s parental rights were terminated earlier, the “child will not be reunited with a parent, [and] adoption, under chapter 63, is the primary permanency option.” § 39.621(6), Fla. Stat. (2006). As the Department of Children and Family Services acknowledges, “the trial court here has not precluded the paternal great grandmother from being among that number seeking to adopt L.K.”

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 987 So. 2d 1267, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422, 2008 WL 3540242 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

987 So. 2d 1267 (M.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.