Mkhitaryan v. County of Clark

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Sergey Mkhitaryan, Case No.: 2:22-cv-00221-JAD-BNW

4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and 5 v. Recommendation

6 County of Clark, [ECF Nos. 2, 9]

7 Defendant

8 The magistrate judge recommends that the court dismiss this case because plaintiff has 9 not complied with this court’s order to file an amended complaint by March 8, 2022.1 The 10 deadline for the plaintiff to object to that recommendation was April 18, 2022, and plaintiff filed 11 nothing and did not ask to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate 12 judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”2 Having reviewed the report 13 and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 14 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 15 Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED without 16 prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s order, and the Petition of Notice [ECF No. 2] is 17 DENIED as moot. 18 19 20 21 1 ECF No. 7. 22 2 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 23 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). ] The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and CLOSE 2) THIS CASE. DE Le 4 US. Districtludge Tenhife! A. Dorsey Dated: April 20, 2022 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23