Mkhitaryan v. County of Clark

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6 SERGEY MKHITARYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00708-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), gly. Order 10 Defendant(s). 11 The Court possesses the inherent authority to reconsider its interlocutory orders. United States v. Martin, 226 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2000). 13 Plaintiff had filed a motion indicating that he required the assistance of counsel due to his 14] “competency.” Docket No. 2. Given the context, the Court construed the motion as a notice of 15] incompetency and appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff based thereon. Docket No. 8. Counsel 16] has now appeared for Plaintiff and indicated that he has in fact been deemed competent by another 17] judge. Docket No. 11 at 4; see also Docket No. 11-1. In light of this correction, the Court 18] VACATES its order appointing counsel and the Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to remove the Federal Public Defender’s office as counsel of record. 21 Dated: September 12, 2024 22 =< a Nancy . Koppe 23 United States ‘Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28