M.J. Kelley Co. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding, Inc.

467 So. 2d 831, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1076, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13681
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1985·No. No. 84-1669·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant seeks review of a summary judgment against it in the amount of [832]*832$6,887.10 representing rental charges for scaffolding leased to the appellant by the appellee plus charges for the alleged loss of the scaffolding and tax. Upon consideration of the briefs and the record on appeal, we conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact as to the recoverable rental charges, the appellant’s responsibility under the lease for the return of the scaffolding, and the amount claimed by the appellee for the loss of the scaffolding. Therefore, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand this cause for further proceedings. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); St. Clair v. Smith, 445 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.J. Kelley Co. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding, Inc., 467 So. 2d 831, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1076, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13681 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

467 So. 2d 831 (M.J. Kelley Co. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kalogridis v. Betts
481 So. 2d 1314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Lawrence v. State
470 So. 2d 102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Buckles v. State
468 So. 2d 1105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)