Kalogridis v. Betts

481 So. 2d 1314, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6160
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1986·No. No. 85-1427·Published

Opinion

SANDERLIN, Judge.

The appellant seeks review of a summary judgment against him whereby he sought a real estate broker’s commission fee, alleging his entitlement based on an oral listing agreement. Upon consideration of the briefs and the record on appeal, plus oral argument, we conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact as to wheth[1315]*1315er the broker produced a buyer under the terms of an enforceable listing agreement.

Therefore, we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); St. Clair v. Smith, 445 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); M.J. Kelley Co. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding, Inc., 467 So.2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kalogridis v. Betts, 481 So. 2d 1314, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6160 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

481 So. 2d 1314 (Kalogridis v. Betts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Clair v. Smith
445 So. 2d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
M.J. Kelley Co. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding, Inc.
467 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)