Kalogridis v. Betts

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kalogridis v. Betts

481 So. 2d 1314, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6160

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1427

StatusPublished

This text of 481 So. 2d 1314 (Kalogridis v. Betts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kalogridis v. Betts, 481 So. 2d 1314, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6160 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

SANDERLIN, Judge.

The appellant seeks review of a summary judgment against him whereby he sought a real estate broker’s commission fee, alleging his entitlement based on an oral listing agreement. Upon consideration of the briefs and the record on appeal, plus oral argument, we conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact as to wheth[1315]*1315er the broker produced a buyer under the terms of an enforceable listing agreement.

Therefore, we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); St. Clair v. Smith, 445 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); M.J. Kelley Co. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding, Inc., 467 So.2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI