Mizell v. State
673 So. 2d 130, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1996 WL 229159
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1996·No. Nos. 95-2887, 95-2892 and 95-2900·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation and to resolve the discrepancy in the sentence between the credit given at probation revocation (132 days) and the amount of credit given at the original sen[131]*131tencing (183 days). Additionally, the trial court should consider whether appellant is entitled to credit for time served in the Department of Corrections as well as time served in jail awaiting final hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mizell v. State, 673 So. 2d 130, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1996 WL 229159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
673 So. 2d 130 (Mizell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hartley v. State
701 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)