Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mizell v. State

Mizell v. State

673 So. 2d 130, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1996 WL 229159
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 8, 1996
DocketNos. 95-2887, 95-2892 and 95-2900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 130 (Mizell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mizell v. State, 673 So. 2d 130, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1996 WL 229159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation and to resolve the discrepancy in the sentence between the credit given at probation revocation (132 days) and the amount of credit given at the original sen[131]*131tencing (183 days). Additionally, the trial court should consider whether appellant is entitled to credit for time served in the Department of Corrections as well as time served in jail awaiting final hearing.

STONE, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartley v. State
701 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 130, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4730, 1996 WL 229159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mizell-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.