Hartley v. State

701 So. 2d 915, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13387, 1997 WL 740777
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 3, 1997
DocketNo. 97-0688
StatusPublished

This text of 701 So. 2d 915 (Hartley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartley v. State, 701 So. 2d 915, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13387, 1997 WL 740777 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation. See Mizell v. State, 673 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The order should reflect that Count I of the affidavit was the trial court’s basis to revoke appellant’s probation.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

PARIENTE, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mizell v. State
673 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 So. 2d 915, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13387, 1997 WL 740777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.