Mizell Live Stock Co. v. Pollard

71 So. 31, 71 Fla. 192
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 71 So. 31 (Mizell Live Stock Co. v. Pollard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mizell Live Stock Co. v. Pollard, 71 So. 31, 71 Fla. 192 (Fla. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a writ of error directed to the granting of a new trial.

The motion for a new trial contained several grounds which questioned the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and also claimed newly discovered evidence. The trial Judge simply granted the motion without specifying the ground upon which his order was based. We have examined the transcript of the record and are of the opinion that the order must be affirmed upon the authority of Ruff v. Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co., 67 Fla. 224, 64 South. Rep. 782, and Chancey v. Williams, 56 Fla. 215, 47 South. Rep. 811.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kight v. American Eagle Fire Insurance
179 So. 792 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Beckwith v. Bailey
161 So. 576 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Carney v. Stringfellow
74 So. 866 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 So. 31, 71 Fla. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mizell-live-stock-co-v-pollard-fla-1916.