Mitchell v. United States

Supreme Court

Mitchell v. United States

368 U.S. 439, 82 S. Ct. 462, 7 L. Ed. 2d 429, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1968

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 22, 1962

Docket448 M

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 368 U.S. 439 (Mitchell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. United States, 368 U.S. 439, 82 S. Ct. 462, 7 L. Ed. 2d 429, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1968 (1962).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari, which presents the question whether materially false testimony was used against petitioner at the trial, are granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing upon petitioner’s motion, treated as a motion for a new trial on the [440]*440ground of newly discovered evidence. Cf. Mesarosh v. United States, 352 U. S. 1. We, of course, intimate no view upon the merits of the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari, which presents the question whether materially false testimony was used against petitioner at the trial, are granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing upon petitioner’s motion, treated as a motion for a new trial on the [440]*440ground of newly discovered evidence. Cf. Mesarosh v. United States, 352 U. S. 1. We, of course, intimate no view upon the merits of the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

368 U.S. 439, 82 S. Ct. 462, 7 L. Ed. 2d 429, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-united-states-scotus-1962.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack