Mitchell v. State
254 S.W. 805, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925, 95 Tex. Crim. 307
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 Tex. Crim. 117 →
Opinion
Under an indictment charging the murder of Will Driskell, appellant was convicted, and his punishment fixed at death.
In another ease, tried in the same court, appellant was convicted of the murder of another person. The death penalty was assessed. On appeal, the judgment was affirmed. See Mitchell v. State, 252 S. W. 1117. Appellant was executed at Waco, Tex. on the 30th of July, 1923.
By reason of his death, the proper disposition of this appeal is its abatement. Such is. the order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 254 S.W. 805, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925, 95 Tex. Crim. 307 (Tex. 1923).
254 S.W. 805 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. State
252 S.W. 1117 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)