Mitchell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mitchell v. State

240 S.W. 1111, 92 Tex. Crim. 37, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 346

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 Tex. Crim. 530 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 17, 1922·No. No. 6976.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the Criminal District^ Court of Tarrant county of robbery, and her punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. We have examined the indictment which in proper form charges appellant with the offense; also the charge of the court, which submits to the jury in accordance with approved precedents the law of the case. No error appearing in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the Criminal District^ Court of Tarrant county of robbery, and her punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. We have examined the indictment which in proper form charges appellant with the offense; also the charge of the court, which submits to the jury in accordance with approved precedents the law of the case. No error appearing in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mitchell v. State, 240 S.W. 1111, 92 Tex. Crim. 37, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 346 (Tex. 1922).

Pincite

240 S.W. 1111 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.