Mitchell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mitchell v. State

578 S.W.3d 858

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 528 S.W.3d 454 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 23, 2019·No. No. ED 106594·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason P. Mitchell ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2012) motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jason P. Mitchell ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2012) motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Mitchell v. State, 578 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

578 S.W.3d 858 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.