Mitchell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mitchell v. State

578 S.W.3d 858

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 23, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106594

StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.W.3d 858 (Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. State, 578 S.W.3d 858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason P. Mitchell ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2012) motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jason P. Mitchell ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2012) motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 S.W.3d 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-moctapp-2019.