Mitchell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mitchell v. State

503 S.W.3d 306, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1130, 2016 WL 6596068

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 8, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103615

StatusPublished

This text of 503 S.W.3d 306 (Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. State, 503 S.W.3d 306, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1130, 2016 WL 6596068 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■Jordan Mitchell appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying without an evi-dentiary hearing his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■Jordan Mitchell appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying without an evi-dentiary hearing his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 S.W.3d 306, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1130, 2016 WL 6596068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-moctapp-2016.