Mitchell v. State
318 S.W.3d 308, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039, 2010 WL 3229951
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1444 →
Opinion
ORDER
Bedford Mitchell (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post- *309 conviction relief under Rule 24.035 after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 318 S.W.3d 308, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039, 2010 WL 3229951 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
318 S.W.3d 308 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.