Mitchell v. State

655 So. 2d 1323, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6401, 1995 WL 353623
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13845
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 1995·No. No. 95-01911·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Scott Mitchell appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He alleges that the trial court failed to give him proper credit for time served on a sentence imposed on violation of probation. The trial court denied the motion without any attachments, except for a memorandum of law that apparently was prepared by a judicial staff attorney. The memorandum recommends denying most of Mr. Mitchell’s requested relief, but advises the trial court to grant credit for time served in Ohio pursuant to the warrant from Pinellas County. Thus, our record does not reveal why the trial court summarily denied relief under these circumstances.

Accordingly, we reverse the denial of Mr. Mitchell’s motion and remand the case for further proceedings,

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. State, 655 So. 2d 1323, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6401, 1995 WL 353623 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

655 So. 2d 1323 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.