Mitchell v. State

311 So. 2d 181, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13891
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1975·No. Nos. 73-416, 73-417·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

BOARDMAN, Judge.

In our original opinion filed in this case (Fla.App.2d, 1974, 289 So.2d 418) we remanded the cause to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County (trial court) with directions to determine, according to RCrP 3.-210(a), whether appellant was mentally competent at the time of his trial. Subsequently, the trial court carried out our directions and entered an appropriate order. The trial court’s order, in pertinent part, is as follows:

1. Homer Wayne Mitchell was, at all times pertinent hereto, and including the 9th day of April, 1973 and the 3rd day of May, 1973, capable of understanding the nature of the charges against him and was further legally sane and competent and capable of assisting his counsel in the preparation and presentation of his defense.

We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of the sanity hearing and find that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the findings of the trial court. We have also examined and reconsidered appellant’s other issues raised on this appeal [182]*182and find they do not constitute reversible error.

Accordingly, the judgments and sentences are

Affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. State, 311 So. 2d 181, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13891 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

311 So. 2d 181 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
384 So. 2d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)