Mitchell v. State
267 So. 2d 22, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6058
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 So. 2d 728 →
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before thé court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Robinson v. State (Fla.App. 1971), 256 So.2d 29; Moore v. State, 59 Fla. 23, 52 So. 971.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. State, 267 So. 2d 22, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6058 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
267 So. 2d 22 (Mitchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. State
59 Fla. 23 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)
Robinson v. State
256 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)