Mitchell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

624 P.2d 571, 290 Or. 361, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 673
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 20, 1981
DocketWCB 78-2298, CA 13356, SC 26914
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 624 P.2d 571 (Mitchell v. State Accident Insurance Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. State Accident Insurance Fund, 624 P.2d 571, 290 Or. 361, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 673 (Or. 1981).

Opinion

DENECKE, C. J.

This is another of the cases in which a claim for Workers’ Compensation benefits is made for disability caused by mental illness allegedly arising out of claimant’s employment. 44 Or App 656, 606P2d 697 (1980).

Plaintiff is a 45-year-old male employed as a probation officer by the State Corrections Division. He had been released from prison in 1964 and worked at various jobs until April 1976 when he commenced working with the Division of Corrections. On July 1, 1976, he left this job in Salem to become a probation officer in Portland. Because of blackouts he had to leave his job on January 31, 1978, and at the time of the hearing he was not back at work.

There is medical evidence that his blackouts were caused by anxiety. He has suffered from anxiety in the past. The evidence also is that his anxiety was caused by family and financial problems as well as incidents on the job. These job incidents were that his co-workers referred to persons on parole or probation as "flakes” or "turkeys” and this made plaintiff very angry; his co-workers made remarks about claimant’s prison time; and he became upset when he was recognized by any of the parolees or probationers.

The referee found claimant’s disability was compensable. The Workers’ Compensation Board found to the contrary. Neither made any finding whether claimant’s condition was caused by circumstances "to which an employe is not ordinarily subjected or exposed other than during a period of regular actual employment.” The Court of Appeals reversed in a Per Curiam opinion, citing James v. SAIF, 44 Or App 520, 605 P2d 1391 (1980).

We remand for the Court of Appeals to proceed in accordance with our opinion in James v. SAIF, 290 Or 343, 624 P2d 565 (1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Mitchell
664 P.2d 1134 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)
Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
635 P.2d 347 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 P.2d 571, 290 Or. 361, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-state-accident-insurance-fund-or-1981.