Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND
This text of 605 P.2d 1391 (Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the matter of the Compensation of Charles MADDOX, Claimant, Respondent,
v.
STATE Accident Insurance Fund, Petitioner.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Darrell E. Bewley, Associate Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were K.R. Maloney, Chief Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Salem.
David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Dye & Olson, Salem.
Before SCHWAB, C.J., and RICHARDSON and ROBERTS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. James v. SAIF, 44 Or. App. 405, 605 P.2d 1368 (1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
605 P.2d 1391, 44 Or. App. 520, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-state-acc-ins-fund-orctapp-1980.