Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND
605 P.2d 1391, 44 Or. App. 520, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2407
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 19, 1980·No. WCB 77-2861 CA 13840·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
In the matter of the Compensation of Charles MADDOX, Claimant, Respondent,
v.
STATE Accident Insurance Fund, Petitioner.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Darrell E. Bewley, Associate Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were K.R. Maloney, Chief Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Salem.
David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Dye & Olson, Salem.
Before SCHWAB, C.J., and RICHARDSON and ROBERTS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. James v. SAIF, 44 Or. App. 405, 605 P.2d 1368 (1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND, 605 P.2d 1391, 44 Or. App. 520, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2407 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
605 P.2d 1391 (Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Maddox
667 P.2d 529 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Maddox
655 P.2d 214 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)
Mitchell v. State Accident Insurance Fund
624 P.2d 571 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
James v. State Accident Insurance Fund
624 P.2d 565 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
Maddox v. State Accident Insurance Fund
624 P.2d 570 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
Paresi v. State Accident Insurance Fund
624 P.2d 572 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)