Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.
361 U.S. 231, 80 S. Ct. 365, 4 L. Ed. 2d 267, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1767
Opinion
In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues sought to be tendered, made apparent in. oral argument and the memoranda of counsel subsequently filed at the Court’s request, the writ of. certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co., 361 U.S. 231, 80 S. Ct. 365, 4 L. Ed. 2d 267, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1767 (1960).
361 U.S. 231 (Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Minnick v. California Department of Corrections
452 U.S. 105 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Doe v. Delaware
450 U.S. 382 (Supreme Court, 1981)
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Etc. v. Twin City Foods, Inc., a Corporation
464 F.2d 246 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
Hodgson v. Stokely-Van Camp
330 F. Supp. 253 (D. Minnesota, 1971)
Yogurt Master, Inc. v. Goldberg
310 F.2d 53 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)