Mitchell v. Mitchell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Mitchell v. Mitchell

227 So. 2d 187, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5958

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided August 26, 1969·No. No. 2864·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-relator applies for rehearing as to our previous denial of his application for supervisory writs.

[188]*188We are unable to consider the application for rehearing. Under Rule XI, Section 6, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal (1963), an application for rehearing will not be considered as to the action of the court in granting or refusing- to grant supervisory writs.

Application for rehearing not considered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-relator applies for rehearing as to our previous denial of his application for supervisory writs.

[188]*188We are unable to consider the application for rehearing. Under Rule XI, Section 6, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal (1963), an application for rehearing will not be considered as to the action of the court in granting or refusing- to grant supervisory writs.

Application for rehearing not considered.

Mitchell v. Mitchell, 227 So. 2d 187, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5958 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

227 So. 2d 187 (Mitchell v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.