Home/Supreme Court/Mitchell v. Harris

Mitchell v. Harris

444 U.S. 1025, 100 S. Ct. 688
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1980
DocketNo. 79-836
StatusPublished
Cited by122 cases

This text of 444 U.S. 1025 (Mitchell v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mitchell v. Harris, 444 U.S. 1025, 100 S. Ct. 688 (1980).

Opinion

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Buspirone Antitrust Litigation
208 F.R.D. 516 (S.D. New York, 2002)
Baxa Corp. v. McGaw, Inc.
996 F. Supp. 1044 (D. Colorado, 1998)
Rolite, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Environmental Systems, Inc.
958 F. Supp. 992 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1997)
THK America, Inc. v. NSK, LTD.
917 F. Supp. 563 (N.D. Illinois, 1996)
Insultherm, Inc. v. Tank Insulation International, Inc.
909 F. Supp. 465 (S.D. Texas, 1995)
Gilliam v. Foster
63 F.3d 287 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Willie E. Sloan
36 F.3d 386 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Mail Order Association of America v. United States Postal Service, McGraw Inc. Newspaper Association of America Magazine Publishers of America, Inc. Tvsm Third Class Mail Association New York State Consumer Protection Board Coalition of Religious Press Associations United Parcel Service Dow Jones & Company, Inc. American Business Press Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Advo, Inc. Time Warner, Inc. Major Mailers Association Shorter-Run Printers Committee Association of Alternate Postal Systems Parcel Shippers Association Reader's Digest Association, Inc. National Newspaper Association, Intervenors. Direct Marketing Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service Dow Jones & Company, Inc. American Business Press Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Time Warner, Inc. Advo, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Telephone Company v. United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service Dow Jones & Company, Inc. American Business Press Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Time Warner, Inc. Advo, Inc., Intervenors. Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers v. United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service Dow Jones & Company, Inc. American Business Press Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Advo, Inc. Time Warner, Inc., Intervenors. Governors of the United States Postal Service v. Postal Rate Commission, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. United Parcel Service Brooklyn Union Gas Company American Business Press Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers American Bankers Association Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Time Warner, Inc. Advo, Inc., Intervenors. Third Class Mail Association v. United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service Dow Jones & Company, Inc. American Business Press Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Time Warner, Inc. Advo, Inc., Intervenors. Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service American Business Press Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Time Warner, Inc. Advo, Inc., Intervenors. Advo, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service Dow Jones & Company, Inc. American Business Press Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Time Warner, Inc., Intervenors. Time Warner, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service Dow Jones & Company, Inc. American Business Press Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers Nashua Corporation and District Photo, Inc. Advo, Inc., Intervenors
2 F.3d 408 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Buehler AG v. Ocrim S.P.A. Ocrim America, Inc.
836 F. Supp. 1305 (N.D. Texas, 1993)
American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission
978 F.2d 727 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Clifton Cameron and Paul Tinson
953 F.2d 240 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Council, Intervenor
901 F.2d 147 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)
Atari Games Corporation and Tengen, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Nintendo of America, Inc., and Nintendo Co., Ltd.
897 F.2d 1572 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
Technicon Instruments Corp. v. Alpkem Corporation
866 F.2d 417 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
706 F. Supp. 94 (D. Massachusetts, 1989)
Ethicon, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
688 F. Supp. 119 (S.D. New York, 1988)
U.S. Aluminum Corporation/texas, a Corporation v. Alumax, Inc., a Corporation
831 F.2d 878 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Ricky Hasbrouck, Dba Rick's Texaco v. Texaco, Inc., a Foreign Corporation
830 F.2d 1513 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. Dba Southwest Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.
827 F.2d 458 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz
807 F.2d 520 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 U.S. 1025, 100 S. Ct. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-harris-scotus-1980.