Mitchell v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 18, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-04348·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED KAREEM MITCHELL, DOC #: oe DATE FILED:_10/18/2023 _ Plaintiff, -V.- 23-cv-4348 (LJL) CITY OF NEW YORK; WARDEN OF AMKC ORDER OF SERVICE (C-95); DEPUTY WARDEN COOK (FEMALE); JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2, Defendants. LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who currently is incarcerated at Clinton Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his constitutional rights during his detention on Rikers Island. By order dated May 5, 2023, Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis.' On August 22, 2023, Chief Judge Swain granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff filed his amended complaint on October 12, 2023, and on October 17, 2023, this action was reassigned to the undersigned. As set forth below, the Court asks the Defendants to waive service of summons, directs the New York City Law Department to identify the named John Doe Defendants, applies Local Civil Rule 33.2 to this action, and refers Plaintiff to the New York Legal Assistance Group’s Pro Se Clinic.

' Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

DISCUSSION A. Waiver of Service The Clerk of Court is directed to notify the New York City Department of Correction (“DOC”) and the New York City Law Department of this order. The Court requests that the City of New York, the Warden of the Anna M. Kross Center (“AMKC”), and AMKC Deputy Warden Cook waive service of summons.

B. Valentin Order Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit the DOC to identify John Doe #1 and John Doe #2. It is therefore ordered that the New York City Law Department, which is the attorney for and agent of the DOC, must ascertain the identity and badge number of each John Doe whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where the defendant may be served.2 The Law Department must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file a second amended complaint naming the John Doe defendant(s). The second amended complaint will replace, not

supplement, the amended complaint. An amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint, the Court will

2 If the Doe defendants are current or former DOC employees or officials, the Law Department should note in the response to this order that an electronic request for a waiver of service can be made under the e-service agreement for cases involving DOC defendants, rather than by personal service at a DOC facility. If the Doe defendants are not a current or former DOC employees or officials, but otherwise work or worked at a DOC facility, the Law Department must provide a residential address where the individuals may be served. screen the second amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an order asking the newly named Defendants to waive service. C. Local Civil Rule 33.2 Local Civil Rule 33.2, which requires defendants in certain types of prisoner cases to respond to specific, court-ordered discovery requests, applies to this action. Those discovery

requests are available on the Court’s website under “Forms” and are titled “Plaintiff’s Local Civil Rule 33.2 Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents.” Within 120 days of service of the complaint, Defendants must serve responses to these standard discovery requests. In their responses, Defendants must quote each request verbatim.3 D. New York Legal Assistance Group Plaintiff may consult the legal clinic in this District that assists people who are parties in civil cases and do not have lawyers. The Clinic is run by a private organization called the New York Legal Assistance Group (“NYLAG”); it is not part of, or run by, the court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the court, which must still be made by any pro se party through the Pro Se Intake Unit).

To receive limited-scope assistance from the Clinic, Plaintiff may mail a signed retainer and intake form to the NYLAG Pro Se Clinic at 40 Foley Square, LL22, NY, NY 10007. Once the paperwork is received, the Clinic will coordinate contact with the litigant. Once the paperwork is received, it may take up to two weeks for the Clinic to contact the litigant. Copies of the Clinic’s flyer, retainer, and intake form are attached to this order.

3 If Plaintiff would like copies of these discovery requests before receiving the responses and does not have access to the website, Plaintiff may request them from the Pro Se Intake Unit. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Clerk of Court is also directed to electronically notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department of this order. The Court requests that Defendants the City of New York, the Warden of AMKC, and AMKC Deputy Warden Cook waive service of summons. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order and the complaint to the New York City Law Department at: 100 Church Street, New York, NY 10007. Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies to this case. Copies of NYLAG’s flyer, retainer, and intake form are attached to this order. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 18, 2023 New York, New York wi Me LER as LEWISJ.LIMAN- United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CV. Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned) AMENDED against: COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? 0mNd—MN L1Yes LINo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section IV.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

Rev. 5/20/16

I. LEGAL BASIS FOR CLAIM State below the federal legal basis for your claim, if known. This form is designed primarily for prisoners challenging the constitutionality of their conditions of confinement; those claims are often brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (against state, county, or municipal defendants) or ina “Bivens” action (against federal defendants). L] Violation of my federal constitutional rights L] Other: Il.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Mitchell v. City of New York (Mitchell v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related