Mitchell v. City of Minneapolis

Eighth Circuit

Mitchell v. City of Minneapolis

676 F.2d 342, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19682

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 29, 1982·No. No. 82-1167·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Mitchell appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court for the District of Minnesota denying his request for injunctive relief and declaring certain actions of the city council invalid. We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the cause for further consideration in light of the repeal of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, Pub. L.No. 97-35, 95 Stat. 519 (1981) (effective Oct. 1, 1981).

[343]*343Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and remanded for further consideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

George Mitchell appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court for the District of Minnesota denying his request for injunctive relief and declaring certain actions of the city council invalid. We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the cause for further consideration in light of the repeal of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, Pub. L.No. 97-35, 95 Stat. 519 (1981) (effective Oct. 1, 1981).

[343]*343Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and remanded for further consideration.

Mitchell v. City of Minneapolis, 676 F.2d 342, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19682 (8th Cir. 1982).

Pincite

676 F.2d 342 (Mitchell v. City of Minneapolis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related