Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.

349 U.S. 918, 75 S. Ct. 658, 99 L. Ed. 1251, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 349 U.S. 427
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 9, 1955·No. No. 387·Published

Opinion

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 886, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Argued March 3, 1955. Stuart Rothman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General SobelojJ, Ralph S. Spritzer, Bessie Margolin and Sylvia S. Ellison. Eberhard P. Deutsch argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was René H. Himel, Jr.

Examination of the record raises a question in the Court’s mind as to whether this case is moot in view of respondent’s completion of his contract. Counsel are invited to submit memoranda upon this point on or before May 14, 1955. See Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U. S. 360; United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U. S. 629.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black object to this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co., 349 U.S. 918, 75 S. Ct. 658, 99 L. Ed. 1251, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 868 (1955).

349 U.S. 918 (Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson
250 U.S. 360 (Supreme Court, 1919)
United States v. W. T. Grant Co.
345 U.S. 629 (Supreme Court, 1953)