Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.

Supreme Court

Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.

349 U.S. 918, 75 S. Ct. 658, 99 L. Ed. 1251, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 868

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 9, 1955

DocketNo. 387

StatusPublished

This text of 349 U.S. 918 (Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co., 349 U.S. 918, 75 S. Ct. 658, 99 L. Ed. 1251, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 868 (1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 886, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Argued March 3, 1955. Stuart Rothman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General SobelojJ, Ralph S. Spritzer, Bessie Margolin and Sylvia S. Ellison. Eberhard P. Deutsch argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was René H. Himel, Jr.

Examination of the record raises a question in the Court’s mind as to whether this case is moot in view of respondent’s completion of his contract. Counsel are invited to submit memoranda upon this point on or before May 14, 1955. See Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U. S. 360; United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U. S. 629.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black object to this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 886, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Argued March 3, 1955. Stuart Rothman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General SobelojJ, Ralph S. Spritzer, Bessie Margolin and Sylvia S. Ellison. Eberhard P. Deutsch argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was René H. Himel, Jr.

Examination of the record raises a question in the Court’s mind as to whether this case is moot in view of respondent’s completion of his contract. Counsel are invited to submit memoranda upon this point on or before May 14, 1955. See Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U. S. 360; United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U. S. 629.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black object to this order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

349 U.S. 918, 75 S. Ct. 658, 99 L. Ed. 1251, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mitchell-v-c-w-vollmer-co-scotus-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack