Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 19, 2015·No. 03-14-00468-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED

03-14-00468-CR

4220808

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

MILAM COUNTY 2/19/2015 5:18:32 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

February 19, 2015, • BILL TORREY

County and District Attorney FILED IN

3rd COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/19/2015 5:18:32 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

Jeffrey D. Kyle Clerk Clerk of the Court of Appeals Third Supreme Judicial District P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711-2547

RE: Mitchell Hollis Wright vs. The State ofTexas Court of Appeals No. 03-14-00468-CR; 03-14-00469-CR; 201h Judicial District Court, Milam County, Texas: Cause No. CR23,384; CR23,385

Dear Clerk:

The Milam County District Attorney's Office's interest in this matter was primarily that the victim be made whole. The Appellant's co-defendant, Kody Allen Adcox, paid the remaining balance owed on restitution on February 12, 2015. (See attached) As such, from our perspective, the appeal is moot.

Furthermore, the Milam County District Attorney's Office agrees with the Appellant that the weight of authority is against the State in all of the Appellant's points of error. Please affirm as modified pursuant to Appellant's prayer for relief.

Unless instructed otherwise, we will not be filing a brief in these matters.

Respectfully,

~Joseph P. Johnson

Ass't County and District Attorney Milam County District Attorney's Office

cc: Justin Bradford Smith HARRELL & STOEBNER, P.C. 2106 Bird Creek Drive Temple, TX 76502 Phone:254-771-1855 Fax: 254-771-2082 Email: justin@templelawoffice.com

The Blake Building • 204 N. Central • Cameron, Texas 76520 • (254) 697-7013 • Fax (254) 697-7016 • Email: daoffice@milamcounty.net

CAUSE NO. CR23, 355

THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT

VS. OF

KODY ALLEN ADCOX MILAM COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER MODIFYING CONDITIONS OF PROBATION

On the 12TH day of February, 2015, came to be heard the State's Motion to modify the conditions of probation heretofore granted in the above entitled and numbered cause on the 11th day of October. 2012 , and the Court finds that the Order placing the Defendant on probation in Cause No. CR23, 355 is hereby amended by adding Condition number 27 in said Order as follows, to-wit:

27. Pay $1654.00 remaining balance owed on restitution by Mitchell Hollas Wright CR23, 385 CT2, co-defendant ofKody Allen Adcox CR23, 355. Both defendants are jointly and severally liable.

All other terms and conditions of the original order of probation dated the 11th day of October, 2012, shall remain in full force and effect as heretofore ordered.

ary, 2015.

J dge, 20th Judicial District ty, Texas

ge receipt of a copy

Of the conditions of my probation as modified and I understand them.

. FILED f)

At l ·.1-0 o'ctock..J:_M Date FEB 12 2015

Probationer

CA~~~~ Probation Officer

MILAM COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT

INACTIVE CASE

Cause : CR23355 Name: KODY ALLEN ADCOX CSO: 013 Probation Date : 10/11/2012 Expiration Date: 09/25/2017 Supervision: 4

FEES

Fee Type Assessed Per Month Total Credit Balance Deliq Amt Probation Fee 3600.00 60.00 1946.00 1654.00 -266.00 District Ccosts 2 301.00 301.00 0.00 0.00 UaFee 40.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 Work Program 25.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 :AC&Lit f I 1" . ·~ .•.

3'679.00 ~fWJ"' ~~ Theft Fee 65.00 0.00 0.00 Crimestoppers 50.00 0.00 0.00 Drug Offender 95.00 0.00 0.00 Educ

Totals 7855.00 60.00 6201.00 1654.00 -2595.00

TRANSACTIONS

Receipt Date Assessed Waived Paid Fee Type Allocation 58451 11105/12 200.00 Probation Fee 60.00 District Ccosts 2 50.00 UaFee 40.00

Work Program 25.00 Crimestoppers 25.00

59276 02/06/13 470.00 Probation Fee 180.00 District Ccosts 2 115.00 Restitution 150.00

Crimestoppers 25.00

59969 04/05/13 153.00 Probation Fee 120.00 Theft Fee 33.00

60259 05/09/13 160.00 Probation Fee 60.00 District Ccosts 2 10.00 Restitution 90.00

60586 06/13/13 275.00 Probation Fee 60.00 District Ccosts 2 105.00 Restitution 110.00

61043 08/02/13 95.00 Drug Offender Educ 95.00 61904 11/07/13 200.00 Probation Fee 179.00 District Ccosts 2 21.00 63182 03/28/14 50.00 Probation Fee 50.00 63323 04/10/14 300.00 Probation Fee 300.00 63645 05115/14 90.00 Probation Fee 90.00 63858 06/11/14 110.00 Probation Fee 101.00 Restitution 9.00

63986 06/27114 500.00 Restitution 500.00 64215 07/21/14 32.00 Theft Fee 32.00 64692 09/18114 50.00 Probation Fee 50.00 64832 10/06/14 500.00 Probation Fee 190.00 Restitution 310.00

65207 11/19/14 400.00 Probation Fee 60.00 Restitution 340.00

65692 01/16/15 120.00 Probation Fee 120.00 65821 02/04/15 2496.00 Probation Fee 1980.00 Restitution 516.00

65821*V 02/13115 -2496.00 Probation Fee -1980.00 Restitution -516.00

New Restitution Will Be Entered.

MOD*1775 02/12/15 1654.00 Restitution New Restitution

Was Added

65945 02/13/15 2496.00 Probation Fee 326.00 Restitution 2170.00

Totals 6201.00

2 1o- l•s -

2 /13j,_s-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State (Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.