Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 29, 2015·No. 03-14-00468-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 28, 2015

NO. 03-14-00468-CR

Mitchell Hollis Wright, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the

court’s judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires

correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that the “Statute

for Offense” is “31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) Penal Code.” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State (Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.