Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 28, 2015
NO. 03-14-00468-CR
Mitchell Hollis Wright, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND
This is an appeal from the judgment adjudicating guilt entered by the trial court. Having
reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the
court’s judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires
correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that the “Statute
for Offense” is “31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) Penal Code.” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.
Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State (Mitchell Hollis Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.