Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Bradbury

79 S.W. 966, 106 Mo. App. 450, 1904 Mo. App. LEXIS 379
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 7, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 79 S.W. 966 (Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Bradbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Bradbury, 79 S.W. 966, 106 Mo. App. 450, 1904 Mo. App. LEXIS 379 (Mo. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

SMITH, P. J.

It is in effect conceded that, in the northwest quarter of section 31, township 50, range 32, of Jackson county, beginning at a point about 2,100 feet west of the point where the Santa Pe railroad crosses the Missouri Pacific tracks, in section 31, township 50, range 32, between Kansas City and Independence, H. L. McElroy owns about four acres of land south of the Missouri Pacific track, and the estate of F. J. Baird owns a little more than nine acres of land adjoining the McElroy land on the west, and also south of the Missouri Pacific main line, through both of which tracts of land runs what was once the right-of-way of the railroad commonly known as the old narrow gauge, from Kansas City to Lexington.

By reference to the following plat it will be seen that the Missouri Pacific Railway curves from the north southward and eastward, and that the old narrow gauge right-of-way ran east and west, and, at the point marked “A” on said plat (it being 1,300 feet east of the east line of the McElroy land), the narrow gauge right-of-way ran into, the Missouri Pacific right-of-way, and was, thereafter, within said Missouri Pacific right-of-way:

[453]*453 PKkOIfNQgphByOH7BRShEkZ8QK2HxVCCDviqIwJGSmKuRVxdBisrjEwaX3E81FILTYCO1ItxwOZekJks

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips Co. v. Southern Pacific Rail Corp.
902 F. Supp. 1310 (D. Colorado, 1995)
Parker v. State
352 So. 2d 1386 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
L. & G. Realty & Construction Co. v. City of Indianapolis
139 N.E.2d 580 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1957)
Berry v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Dry Goods Co.
211 S.W.2d 35 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1948)
Anson v. Tietze
190 S.W.2d 193 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1945)
Wood Preserving Corporation v. State Tax Commission
179 So. 254 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Hubbard v. Missouri Pac. R.
288 F. 945 (E.D. Arkansas, 1923)
Hatton v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Co.
162 S.W. 227 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.W. 966, 106 Mo. App. 450, 1904 Mo. App. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-pacific-railway-co-v-bradbury-moctapp-1904.