Missouri Gas Energy v. Grant County Assessor

2016 OK CIV APP 44, 376 P.3d 923, 2016 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 14, 2016 WL 3679197
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 13, 2016
DocketCase No. 114,405
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2016 OK CIV APP 44 (Missouri Gas Energy v. Grant County Assessor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Missouri Gas Energy v. Grant County Assessor, 2016 OK CIV APP 44, 376 P.3d 923, 2016 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 14, 2016 WL 3679197 (Okla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Opinion by

Bay Mitchell, Judge:

{ 1 The dispositive issue presented in this accelerated appeal under Supreme Court Rule 1.86(a)(1) is whether natural gas ("gas") in storage constitutes "goods, wares, and merchandise" for purposes of the Freeport Exemption, Okla, Const. art, X, § 6A; or, alternatively, whether the gas allocated to Appellant for taxation purposes has a taxable situs in Oklahoma as requlred by 68 0.8. § 2831.

T2 Appellant Missouri "Gas Energy ("MGE") is a local gas distribution company with its headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri MGE purchases gas from suppliers and transports the gas via interstate pipelines for resale to its customers in Missouri. MGE has transportation 'and storage contracts with Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. ("Southern Star"), an interstate pipeline company based in Owensboro, Kentucky and regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,. Southern Star's pipeline system extends across parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Colorado, and Wyoming. MGE purchases gas from suppliers and then nominates the purchased volumes of gas for receipt into the Southern Star pipeline system at various pooling points. Depending on the type of nomination made by MGE, Southern Star then either transports the gas to MGE's delivery points in Missouri or credits the gas to MGE's system wide storage account. All of MGE's gas is sold to customers in Missouri. MGE sells no gas and has no employees in Oklahoma.

T3 Southern Star also owns and operates eight underground storage fac111t1es which are connected to its pipeline. One such facility is the Webb facility located in Grant County, Oklahoma. MGE claims the gas injected at the Webb facility enters the Southern Star pipeline system at meter points in Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Texas, and Oklahoma. MGE maintains that the gas stored at the Webb facility does not all physically originate in Oklahoma. While Southern Star has possession of the gas in storage, title to the gas remains with its customers, including MGE,

1 4 For ad valorem tax purposes, Southern Star allocates a volume of gas stored at the [925]*925Webb storage facility as of January 1 of each calendar year to each of its customers, including MGE, Copies of these allocations are provided to the- Grant County Assessor, Ap-pellee, who then assesses personal property ad valorem taxes against the allocated storage volumes. For tax year 2011, MGE received its Webb storage facility allocation and timely filed a Freeport Exemption Declaration for the portion of the gas allocated to it which MGE claimed did not originate in Oklahoma,. The Grant County Assessor ("Assessor") and Appellee, Grant County Board of Equalization ("Board"), (collectively, "Ap-pellees"), each denied MGE's Freeport Application, MGE timely filed an appeal to the district court seeking review of the Appel-lees' denials pursuant to 68 O.S. § 2880.1.1 MGE filed a motion for summary judgment arguing there were no disputed facts and that it was entitled to the Freeport Exemption as a matter of law. Alternatively, MGE argued the gas allocated to it which did not originate in Oklahoma did not have a taxable situs in Oklahoma as required under 68 0.8. §.2831. Appellees filed a response and cross-motion for summary judgment arguing MGE had not met its burden to show the gas allocated to it met all of the qualifications for a Freeport Exemption, the Freeport Exemption did not apply to natural gas in storage, and that the gas had a taxable situs in Oklahoma.

15 At the November 10, 2014 hearing on the cross- motions for summary judgment, the district court granted Appellees summary judgment motion finding the Freeport Exemption, Okla,. Const. art, X, § 6A, did not apply to natural gas in storage because it is not included in the category of "goods, wares and merchandise" for purposes of the Free-port Exemption, The trial court made no determination whether there were any disputed questions of fact, On August 5, 2015, MGE filed a motion to reconsider based, in part, on the enactment of House Rill ("HB") 1962, effective May 6, 2015, which amended 68 0.8. § 2807(9) to provide that oil, gas, and petroleum products constitute "goods, wares, and merchandise" for purposes of ad valorem taxation, including claims of entitlement. to the Freeport Exemption.2 MGE also asked the court to decide whether the gas stored at the Webb facility which did not originate in Oklahoma and allocated to it had taxable situs in Grant County which would have pro- . vided an alternative to avoid taxation. The trial court denied MGE's motion to reconsider and found the gas had a taxable situs in Grant County. MGE appealed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW -

"[ 6 Whether summary judgment was properly granted is a question of law which we review de novo. Barker v. State Insurance Fund, 2001 OK 94, ¶ 7, 40 P.3d 463. "In a de novo review, we have plenary, independent and non-deferential authority to determine whether the trial court erred in its application: of the law and whether there is any genuine issue of material fact." Id. Here, MGE has only appealed the trial court's legal conclusions that- natural gas in storage does not qualify as "goods, wares, and merchandise" under the Freeport Exemption and that the natural gas at issue has a taxable sittis in Grant County. Questions of law, of course, are reviewed de novo. Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, 8, 85 P.3d 841, 845.

GOODS, WARES AND MERCHANDISE

17 Under Oklahoma law, "[alll property in this state, whether real or personal, except that which is specifically exempt by law... shall be subject to ad valorem taxation." 68 0.8. § 2804. Article X, § 6A of the Oklahoma, Constitution, commonly referred to as the "Freeport Exemption" provides:

. A, All property consigned to a consignee 'in this State from outside this State to be forwarded to a point outside this State, which is entitled under the tariffs, rules, . and regulations approved by the Interstate - Commerce Commission to be forwarded at through rates from the point of origin to 'the point of destination, if not detained [926]*926within this State for a period of more than ninety (90) days, shall be deemed to be property moving in interstate commerce, and no such property shall be subject to taxation in this State; provided, that goods, wares and merchandise, whether or not moving on through rates, shall be deemed to move in interstate commerce, - and not subject to taxation in this State if not detained more than nine (9) months where such goods, wares and merchandise are so held for assembly, storage, manufacturing, processing or fabricating purposes; provided, further, that personal property consigned for sale within this State must be assessed as any ~ other personal property. |
B. The Legislature shall enact laws gov- .. erning the procedures for making application to the county assessor for purposes of the exemption authorized by this section, including the time as of which the application must be filed and information to be included with the application.

(Emphasis added). MGE contended a portion of the natural gas in storage at the Webb storage facility and allocated to it falls under the terms of the second clause of the Free-port Exemption (emphasized above). The second clause exempts property from ad va-lorem taxation under the following cireum-stances: °

1. The property must be "goods, wares and merchandise." Okla Const. art. X, § 6A.
2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MISSOURI GAS ENERGY v. GRANT COUNTY ASSESSOR
2016 OK CIV APP 44 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 OK CIV APP 44, 376 P.3d 923, 2016 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 14, 2016 WL 3679197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/missouri-gas-energy-v-grant-county-assessor-oklacivapp-2016.