Mirrolike Mfg. Co. v. Devoe & Raynolds Co.

3 F.2d 847
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1924
Docket51
StatusPublished

This text of 3 F.2d 847 (Mirrolike Mfg. Co. v. Devoe & Raynolds Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mirrolike Mfg. Co. v. Devoe & Raynolds Co., 3 F.2d 847 (2d Cir. 1924).

Opinion

3 F.2d 847 (1924)

MIRROLIKE MFG. CO., Inc., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
DEVOE & RAYNOLDS CO., Inc., Respondent Appellee.

No. 51.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 3, 1924.

James L. Steuart and Frank S. Moore, both of New York City, for appellant.

William D. Gaillard and C. A. L. Massie, both of New York City, for appellee.

Before ROGERS and MANTON, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Decree (3 F.[2d] 846) affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mirrolike Mfg. Co. v. Devoe & Raynolds Co.
3 F.2d 847 (Second Circuit, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 F.2d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mirrolike-mfg-co-v-devoe-raynolds-co-ca2-1924.