Miree v. United States
Opinions
The Court en banc adopts as its opinion Parts I, II, and IV of the majority panel opinion in this cause, 526 F.2d 679-686. The Court en banc adopts as its opinion the dissenting opinion of Judge Dyer, 526 F.2d 686-688 in lieu of Part III of the majority panel opinion. While not directly in point, the Court has reviewed the case of United States v. Orleans, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 1971, 48 L.Ed.2d 390. The reasoning of the dissenting opinion, adopted here, is remarkably consistent with the policy considerations noted by the Chief Justice in Orleans.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
538 F.2d 643 (Miree v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.