MIRAN v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MIRAN v. State

997 So. 2d 526, 2009 WL 32418

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 7, 2009

Docket2D07-4533

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 997 So. 2d 526 (MIRAN v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MIRAN v. State, 997 So. 2d 526, 2009 WL 32418 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

997 So.2d 526 (2009)

Seyed R. MIRAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D07-4533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 7, 2009.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Seyed R. Miran appeals an order revoking his probation. The trial court found that Miran violated conditions one and three of his supervision order by leaving the jurisdiction without permission and by failing to report. Because these violations were established solely on the basis of hearsay evidence, we reverse. See McCarrick v. State, 553 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Adams v. State, 521 So.2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

Reversed.

NORTHCUTT, C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

997 So.2d 526 (2009)

Seyed R. MIRAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D07-4533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 7, 2009.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Seyed R. Miran appeals an order revoking his probation. The trial court found that Miran violated conditions one and three of his supervision order by leaving the jurisdiction without permission and by failing to report. Because these violations were established solely on the basis of hearsay evidence, we reverse. See McCarrick v. State, 553 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Adams v. State, 521 So.2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

Reversed.

NORTHCUTT, C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

997 So. 2d 526, 2009 WL 32418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miran-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Seyed R. MIRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Seyed R. MIRAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.