Minuto v. Wendt

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Minuto v. Wendt. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 F. App'x 245
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2006·No. 05-6729·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6729

MARCO MINUTO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KEVIN WENDT, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution at Gilmer,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 05-7358

Petitioner - Appellant,

KEVIN WENDT, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution at Gilmer,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-87-1; CA-04-87-1-IMK) Submitted: February 8, 2006 Decided: May 26, 2006

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marco Minuto, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Marco Minuto appeals from

the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition, denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for

reconsideration, and denying his subsequent motion for

clarification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Minuto v. Wendt, Nos. CA-04-87-1; CA-04-87-1-IMK (N.D.

W. Va. May 3 & Aug. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minuto v. Wendt, (4th Cir. 2006).

Minuto v. Wendt (Minuto v. Wendt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241