Minuto v. Wendt

182 F. App'x 245
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2006·No. Nos. 05-6729, 05-7358·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Marco Minuto appeals from the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration, and denying his subsequent motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Minuto v. Wendt, Nos. CA-04-87-1; CA-04-87-1-IMK (N.D. W. Va. May 3 & Aug. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [246]*246and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minuto v. Wendt, 182 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2006).

182 F. App'x 245 (Minuto v. Wendt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. Bell
D. Maryland, 2021