Mintz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
12 N.E.2d 569, 276 N.Y. 546, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1117
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if there were error in the form of the two specific questions submitted to the jury such error does not constitute reversible error when the charge as a whole is considered. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mintz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, 12 N.E.2d 569, 276 N.Y. 546, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1117 (N.Y. 1937).
12 N.E.2d 569 (Mintz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cross Armored Carrier Corp. v. Valentine
49 Misc. 2d 917 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)
Halper v. Ætna Life Insurance
42 Misc. 2d 184 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1964)
Jacobowitz v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
10 A.D.2d 159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Barbato v. Vollmer
273 A.D. 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
55 N.E.2d 483 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)