Minority Television Project, Inc. v. Dish Network L.L.C.

District Court, N.D. California·Decided November 24, 2021·No. 3:21-cv-02214·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 5 6 MINORITY TELEVISION PROJECT, Case No. 21-cv-02214-MMC INC., 7 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS; DISMISSING 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT v. WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO DISH NETWORK L.L.C., 10 Defendant.

11 12 Before the Court is defendant Dish Network L.L.C.'s ("Dish") Motion, filed August 13 27, 2021, "to Dismiss First Amended Complaint." Plaintiff Minority Television Project, Inc. 14 ("Minority") has filed opposition, to which Dish has replied. Having read and considered 15 the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 17 In its First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), Minority alleges that it is a "non-profit 18 corporation" operating KMTP-TV, an "educational noncommercial television station" (see 19 FAC ¶ 36), that Dish is a "satellite television company" (see FAC ¶ 27) "provid[ing] 20 satellite television service to . . . subscribers in San Francisco and elsewhere in this 21 judicial district" (see FAC ¶ 22), and that, under regulations promulgated by the Federal 22 Communications Commission ("FCC"), a noncommercial television station may "require a 23 satellite broadcast company to carry its signal," a requirement known as "mandatory 24 carriage" (see FAC ¶ 32; see also FAC ¶ 33 (alleging, "by October 1st of the year 25 preceding each three-year carriage cycle," a noncommercial television station that 26 "elect[s] mandatory carriage with the satellite carrier serving [its] local market" will have 27 1 its signal carried).) 2 Minority alleges that, although "[p]rior to 2018," Dish had "carried the television 3 broadcast signal of KMTP" (see FAC ¶ 25), Dish did not carry KMTP's signal "for the 4 three-year election that began January 1, 2018" (see FAC ¶ 36), a decision the FCC 5 found "permissible," given's Minority's failure to request mandatory carriage in the 6 manner prescribed in then-governing FCC regulations (see FAC ¶ 41). 7 Minority also alleges, however, that, with respect to the three-year cycle beginning 8 January 1, 2021, Minority filed a mandatory carriage request on behalf of KMTP in the 9 manner required by FCC regulations (see FAC ¶¶ 12, 33), but Dish "fail[ed] to carry" 10 KMTP's broadcast signal (see FAC ¶ 1). According to Minority, Dish's failure to carry 11 KMTP's signal beginning January 1, 2021, constitutes a violation of 47 C.F.R. § 76.66, 12 which regulation requires a satellite carrier to "carry upon request the signals of all 13 television broadcast stations located within the local market." See 47 C.F.R. 14 § 76.66(b)(1). 15 Based on the above allegations, Minority asserts a single claim for relief, 16 specifically, a claim under 47 U.S.C. § 401, which provides that, "[i]f any person fails to 17 obey an order of the [FCC]," the "party injured thereby . . . may apply to the appropriate 18 district court of the United States for enforcement of such order." See 47 U.S.C. 19 § 401(b). 21 By order filed July 21, 2021, the Court granted Dish's motion to dismiss the initial 22 complaint, finding Minority had not alleged sufficient facts to support a finding that Dish 23 failed to comply with § 76.66. In particular, the Court found Minority did not allege facts 24 sufficient to support a finding that Dish had an obligation to carry KMTP's signal, as the 25 initial complaint did not allege Minority had, as required by § 76.66(d)(1)(iii), sent "notice 26 of its election" to "the email address provided by the satellite carrier and carbon copied to 27 ElectionNotices@FCC.gov." See 47 C.F.R. § 76.66(d)(1)(iii). By that same order, 1 In its FAC, Minority does not allege that it complied with the notice requirements 2 set forth in § 76.66(d)(1)(iii), but, rather, that it was not required to do so. (See FAC ¶¶ 9- 3 10.) In seeking dismissal, Dish argues § 76.66(d)(1)(iii) is applicable to Minority. As set 4 forth below, the Court agrees with Dish.2 5 Pursuant to statute, a "satellite carrier" is required to "carry upon request the 6 signals of all television broadcast stations located within [the] local market" in which those 7 stations operate. See 47 U.S.C. § 338(a)(1). To "assure compliance" with that 8 obligation, see 47 U.S.C. § 338(a)(2), the FCC has promulgated regulations, including 9 § 76.66, which regulations, as amended in 2019, have been explained by the FCC in a 10 document titled "Rules and Regulations, FCC, Electronic Delivery of MVPD 11 Communications; Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative" (hereinafter, "Report and 12 Order"). See 2019 WL 4077129, 84 FR 45659 (August 30, 2019). 13 As explained in detail in the Report and Order, the FCC amended § 76.66 and 14 other regulations in 2019 to "modernize [its] carriage election notice rules by permitting 15 broadcasters [1] to post their carriage elections online, and [2] to send notices to [satellite 16 carriers] only when changing their carriage election status." See id. at 45659.3 The first 17 of those amendments, as applicable to "noncommercial television stations," is set forth in 18 47 C.F.R. § 73.3527(e)(12), which requires any such station "requesting mandatory 19 carriage . . . [to] place a copy of such request in its public file." See 47 C.F.R. 20 § 73.3527(e)(12). The second of those amendments is set forth in § 76.66(d)(1)(iii), 21 which requires "[a] station [to] send a notice of its election to a satellite carrier only if 22 changing its election with respect to one or more of the markets served by that carrier," 23 and requires "[s]uch notice . . . be sent to the email address provided by the satellite 24 carrier and carbon copied to ElectionNotices@FCC.gov. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.66(d)(1)(iii). 25 2 In light of this finding, the Court does not consider herein Dish's alternative 26 argument that § 76.66 does not constitute an "order" for purposes of § 401. 27 3 Prior to the above-referenced amendments, a broadcaster was required to send 1 Here, Minority argues, it was only required to comply with the first of the above- 2 referenced regulations, and with respect thereto, relies on its allegation that it "timely . . . 3 plac[ed] a notice on its online public file." (See FAC ¶ 11). Minority argues that the 4 second regulation applies only to commercial stations, and, consequently, it was not 5 required to send notice of its election "to the email address provided by the satellite 6 carrier." See 47 C.F.R. § 76.66(d)(1)(iii). 7 As Dish points out, however, nothing in § 76.66 or any other regulation limits 8 application of § 76.66(d)(1)(iii) to commercial stations. Rather, § 76.66(d)(1)(iii) applies to 9 "[a] station," a term that encompasses commercial and noncommercial stations. See 47 10 C.F.R. § 76

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minority Television Project, Inc. v. Dish Network L.L.C., (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Minority Television Project, Inc. v. Dish Network L.L.C. (Minority Television Project, Inc. v. Dish Network L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related