FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
Enforcement provisions
47 U.S.C. § 401
Title47 — Telecommunications
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 401 (Enforcement provisions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 401.
Text
(a)Jurisdiction
The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction, upon application of the Attorney General of the United States at the request of the Commission, alleging a failure to comply with or a violation of any of the provisions of this chapter by any person, to issue a writ or writs of mandamus commanding such person to comply with the provisions of this chapter.
(b)Orders of Commission
If any person fails or neglects to obey any order of the Commission other than for the payment of money, while the same is in effect, the Commission or any party injured thereby, or the United States, by its Attorney General, may apply to the appropriate district court of the United States for the enforcement of such order. If, after hearing, that court determines that the order wa
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States
307 U.S. 125 (Supreme Court, 1939)
Neil Ellis v. Tribune Television Co., Docket No. 05-1983-Cv
443 F.3d 71 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Arcadian Fertilizer, L.P. v. Mpw Industrial Services, Inc.
249 F.3d 1293 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Peninsula Communications, Inc.
287 F.3d 832 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc. v. Public Utilities Commission of Maine
742 F.2d 1 (First Circuit, 1984)
Ambassador, Inc. v. United States
325 U.S. 317 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Prayze Fm, Also Known as Incom, L.L.C., Mark Blake and Loretta Spivey v. Federal Communications Commission
214 F.3d 245 (Second Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Stephen Paul Dunifer
219 F.3d 1004 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Beattie v. Centurytel, Inc.
234 F.R.D. 160 (E.D. Michigan, 2006)
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission
740 F.2d 566 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
New Bank of New England, N.A. v. Tak Communications, Inc. (In Re Tak Communications. Inc.)
138 B.R. 568 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1992)
South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
570 F. Supp. 227 (M.D. Louisiana, 1983)
Federal Communications Commission, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Taft B. Schreiber and McA Inc., Appellees-Cross-Appellants
329 F.2d 517 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
276 F.2d 525 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
744 F.2d 1107 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
Ruggiero v. Federal Communications Commission
317 F.3d 239 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)
Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc. v. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
423 F.3d 1056 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Central New York Right to Life Federation v. Radio Station W. I. B. X.
479 F. Supp. 8 (N.D. New York, 1979)
Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission
748 F.2d 879 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Any & All Radio Station Transmission Equipment
169 F.3d 548 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title IV, §401, 48 Stat. 1092; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909; Pub. L. 93–528, §6(a), Dec. 21, 1974, 88 Stat. 1709.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
1974—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 93–528 repealed subsec. (d) which provided that the provisions of sections 28 and 29 of title 15, section 345(1) of title 28, and sections 44 and 45 of title 49, shall be held to apply to any suit in equity arising under sections 201 to 222 of this title, wherein the United States is complainant.
Satutory Notes and related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorney" for "district attorney" in subsec. (c). See section 541 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and Historical and Revision Notes thereunder.
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
1974—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 93–528 repealed subsec. (d) which provided that the provisions of sections 28 and 29 of title 15, section 345(1) of title 28, and sections 44 and 45 of title 49, shall be held to apply to any suit in equity arising under sections 201 to 222 of this title, wherein the United States is complainant.
Satutory Notes and related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorney" for "district attorney" in subsec. (c). See section 541 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and Historical and Revision Notes thereunder.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/401.