Minnie E. Haby, Joined Pro Forma by Her Husband, Homer E. Haby v. Stanolind Oil and Gas Company

225 F.2d 723, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4906
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 1955
Docket15197
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 225 F.2d 723 (Minnie E. Haby, Joined Pro Forma by Her Husband, Homer E. Haby v. Stanolind Oil and Gas Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Minnie E. Haby, Joined Pro Forma by Her Husband, Homer E. Haby v. Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, 225 F.2d 723, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4906 (5th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to have an oil, gas and mineral lease covering lands in three sections, numbered 4, 5 and t, Block G, C. & M. R. R. Co. Survey located *724 in Reagan County, Texas, declared terminated in so far only as it affects Sections 5 and 7. Neither the complaint nor the record discloses the changes in ownership or other facts, if any, which might keep the holders of interests under the lease in Section 4 from being indispensable parties to this litigation. While the question of indispensable parties was not raised by the parties, it may become necessary for this Court to raise it sua sponte. Hoe, v. Wilson, 9 Wall. 501, 76 U.S. 501, 19 L.Ed. 762; 3 Moore’s Federal Practice 2nd. ed., Paragraph 19.06, p. 214.

Each of the parties is requested within thirty days from this date to file in this Court such stipulation of fact, amendment, pleading or brief as, in the opinion of such party, may aid the Court in disposing of the question of indispensable parties and/or fractional termination of the lease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. US/Intelicom, Inc.
202 F.R.D. 321 (S.D. Florida, 2001)
Shaw v. Shaw
603 So. 2d 287 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1992)
Curtis v. United Transportation Union
486 F. Supp. 966 (E.D. Arkansas, 1980)
Harris L. Kimball v. The Florida Bar
537 F.2d 1305 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Terrebonne Land Development Corp. v. Superior Oil Co.
65 F.R.D. 375 (E.D. Louisiana, 1974)
Padgett v. Theus
484 P.2d 697 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1971)
Filipino Federation of America, Inc. v. Cubico
380 P.2d 488 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1963)
McSHAN v. SHERRILL
283 F.2d 462 (Ninth Circuit, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 F.2d 723, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minnie-e-haby-joined-pro-forma-by-her-husband-homer-e-haby-v-stanolind-ca5-1955.