Minnelli v. Marotta
212 A.D. 834
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead anew within twenty days upon paying said costs. The plaintiff should state the facts on which is based the allegation that she was “ lawfully on the premises,” whether as a tenant, or a visitor, or in such manner as the fact may be. (See Fairchild v. Leo, 149 App. Div. 31.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Minnelli v. Marotta, 212 A.D. 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
212 A.D. 834 (Minnelli v. Marotta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barker v. Gibralter Credit Corp.
234 A.D. 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)