Minnelli v. Marotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Minnelli v. Marotta

212 A.D. 834

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1925

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 A.D. 834 (Minnelli v. Marotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minnelli v. Marotta, 212 A.D. 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead anew within twenty days upon paying said costs. The plaintiff should state the facts on which is based the allegation that she was “ lawfully on the premises,” whether as a tenant, or a visitor, or in such manner as the fact may be. (See Fairchild v. Leo, 149 App. Div. 31.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead anew within twenty days upon paying said costs. The plaintiff should state the facts on which is based the allegation that she was “ lawfully on the premises,” whether as a tenant, or a visitor, or in such manner as the fact may be. (See Fairchild v. Leo, 149 App. Div. 31.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D. 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minnelli-v-marotta-nyappdiv-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack