Barker v. Gibralter Credit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barker v. Gibralter Credit Corp.

234 A.D. 773

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for insufficiency reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead anew within twenty days upon paying said costs. We are of opinion that the allegation that plaintiff was “ lawfully ” upon the premises of the appellants [774]*774is insufficient to charge the appealing defendants with any duty in the absence of allegations of fact showing by what right plaintiff was on the said premises, whether as a tenant or an invitee or in such manner as the fact may be. (Minnelli v. Maroita, 212 App. Div. 834.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for insufficiency reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead anew within twenty days upon paying said costs. We are of opinion that the allegation that plaintiff was “ lawfully ” upon the premises of the appellants [774]*774is insufficient to charge the appealing defendants with any duty in the absence of allegations of fact showing by what right plaintiff was on the said premises, whether as a tenant or an invitee or in such manner as the fact may be. (Minnelli v. Maroita, 212 App. Div. 834.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Barker v. Gibralter Credit Corp., 234 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

234 A.D. 773 (Barker v. Gibralter Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related